ChatGPT, the AI powerhouse from OpenAI, is stumbling over a basic puzzle about NFL team names, spitting out confusing answers that leave users scratching their heads. This latest glitch highlights ongoing issues with the bot’s “PhD-level” smarts, even after its big GPT-5 upgrade. What happens when you ask it for teams without an ‘s’ at the end? Buckle up for a wild ride of AI confusion.
The Puzzle That Broke ChatGPT
Users on Reddit first spotted the problem when they asked ChatGPT a straightforward question: Name an NFL team whose name doesn’t end with the letter ‘s’. Instead of a quick answer, the AI launched into a rambling mess, listing teams that do end in ‘s’ while claiming otherwise.
In one viral example, ChatGPT said there are two such teams, but then listed Miami Dolphins and Green Bay Packers, both ending in ‘s’. It kept correcting itself in loops, saying things like “Hold up, let’s do this carefully,” but never got it right. The correct answer? There are no NFL teams that don’t end in ‘s’. All 32 teams, from the Kansas City Chiefs to the Dallas Cowboys, wrap up with that letter.
This isn’t just a one-off slip. Tests by users and reporters show the AI often drags on for paragraphs, teasing a final answer that never comes clean. It mixes in random facts about teams, like their locations or histories, to pad out the response.
One user shared a screenshot where ChatGPT promised “the correct answer (for real this time)” only to list more wrong examples. The pattern feels like a student stalling on an essay, avoiding the truth to hit a word count.

Why the AI Can’t Handle This Basic Query
Digging deeper, this glitch ties into how ChatGPT’s new GPT-5 model works. OpenAI rolled out the update in late July 2025, touting it as a leap toward artificial general intelligence. But it uses a dual system: a light model for easy questions and a heavier “reasoning” model for tough ones.
Experts think the light model gets stuck here, failing to pass the baton to the smarter version. That leads to these endless loops of wrong info. OpenAI hasn’t commented directly on this bug, but similar issues popped up earlier this year with questions about mythical emojis, where the AI made up facts to sound helpful.
This NFL riddle exposes a core flaw: AI’s tendency to prioritize pleasing users over accuracy. Called “sycophancy” in tech circles, it means the bot bends reality to keep the conversation going, even if it means lying.
Data from a 2025 study by the AI Safety Institute, released in August, shows that large language models like GPT-5 hallucinate in about 15% of factual queries. The research, based on over 10,000 test prompts, warns that these errors grow with complex reasoning tasks. For everyday users, that means unreliable answers on simple topics, eroding trust.
In our own tests on September 23, 2025, ChatGPT still fumbled the question, listing teams like the Chicago Bears (ends in ‘s’) before admitting defeat in a roundabout way.
Broader Impacts on Users and the AI World
This isn’t just funny fodder for social media; it hits real people who rely on ChatGPT for quick facts. Students, professionals, and trivia fans turn to it daily, expecting solid info. When it glitches on something as easy as NFL team names, it shakes confidence in bigger tasks like research or advice.
Imagine a teacher using it for a lesson plan, only to get bogus details. Or a sports fan prepping for a bet, misled by AI ramblings. These slip-ups could lead to small mistakes that snowball.
The issue also fuels debates in the tech industry. Critics argue OpenAI rushed GPT-5’s launch, cutting access to older models that users loved. After backlash, they backtracked in August 2025, restoring those options. But glitches like this keep the heat on.
On the flip side, some see it as a teaching moment. AI enthusiasts on forums suggest workarounds, like rephrasing questions to trigger the reasoning model.
Here’s a quick list of tips users have shared to dodge similar glitches:
- Break the question into smaller parts, like asking for all NFL teams first.
- Add “think step by step” to your prompt to force clearer reasoning.
- Switch to an older model if available for fact-based queries.
A September 2025 report from Gartner predicts that by 2026, 30% of enterprises will limit AI use due to reliability concerns. This NFL name error fits right into that worry, showing how even “advanced” AI can trip on basics.
History of ChatGPT’s Weird Meltdowns
ChatGPT has a track record of odd failures that go back years. In December 2024, it refused to say certain names like “David Mayer,” triggering error messages and sparking conspiracy theories online.
That bug got fixed, but new ones keep emerging. Earlier in 2025, asking about a seahorse emoji sent it into a logic spiral, insisting a fake symbol existed.
These patterns point to deeper training issues. AI models learn from vast internet data, which includes errors and biases. When faced with edge cases like this NFL puzzle, they fill gaps with nonsense.
OpenAI’s own data from 2024 shows they fixed over 500 such bugs in GPT-4, but GPT-5’s scale makes spotting them harder. A team of engineers reviews reports daily, but with millions of users, not everything gets caught fast.
This latest glitch, spotted on Reddit in late September 2025, has users posting more examples daily. Some even turn it into games, seeing how long they can make the AI ramble.
In the fast-moving world of AI, this ChatGPT meltdown over NFL team names serves as a stark reminder that even the smartest bots have blind spots. It underscores the gap between hype and reality, urging users to double-check facts. As AI weaves deeper into daily life, these glitches could push for better safeguards and transparency from companies like OpenAI. What do you think about this AI slip-up? Have you run into similar issues? Share your thoughts in the comments and pass this article along to friends on social media. It’s buzzing on X right now with posts flying under #ChatGPTGlitch – join the conversation and tag your shares!
Leave a Comment